Thanks for your analysis so far Anita. I know the company that sells this particular product. I took it for a month and it fucked me up. I really regret having took it.
Not naming names but a Doctor who promotes this product, just suggested that it was my immune system that was making me feel so fatigued.
I find the whole episode very depressing because I was seeking treatment that wouldn’t harm me.
Not one person has told human consciousness support company that the following quoted suggestion didn't work to fix any uncomfortableness. This after they approach the company and ask about uncomfortableness. not. one.
"There's no need to feel uncomfortable while taking MasterPeace. It's rare, but if one does feel uncomfortable in any way simply lower the numbers of drops taken at a time and increase clean water intake. For some they will want to drop the dosage to 1 drop once or twice a day, to avoid any possible discomfort.
Both ingredients in Masterpeace are known and studied 100% safe and non toxic.
Please refer to our FAQ on our website and the brochure in our packages for similar instruction."
I have been using Vanterre Zeolite Clinoptilolite for some time and was alerted to this issue already by an article by Dr. Ana Mihalcea some time ago.
After reading this article, I will probably not use any of these modern, supposedly health-promoting products anymore, as they all seem to have undesirable and sometimes serious drawbacks like methylene blue or CDS.
So I will probably just stick to organic apple cider vinegar and the vitamins directly from certain fruits like lemons, etc.
book called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger. ana claims it slanders zeolite. well after buying the book... there's not mention of zeolite in it. she just lies lies lies
nobody is holding ana mihalcea accountable. also she's all like "ive already had two patients die of shedding"... well then how good of a doc are ya ana? maybe try the natural stuff not made of formaldehyde sodium cyanide acid and salt originally used a boiler room cleaner in industrial factories... maybe try that and learn the differences in the massive category of "zeolite" where there's only one kind fit for human consumption lol
Are you able to direct me to information regarding drawbacks of both MB and.CDS. Am wondering if either/both are good for some/not so good for others -- simply must be determined individually?
Thanks for the well documented process you are doing here. I recently had the benefit of hearing how many have suffered serious problems after taking this product. A smaller % seemed to have no problem and that could indicate a low contamination of the tech in these people.
not one person has told human consciousness support company that the following quoted suggestion didn't work to fix any uncomfortableness. This after they approach the company and ask about uncomfortableness. not. one. person.
"There's no need to feel uncomfortable while taking MasterPeace. It's rare, but if one does feel uncomfortable in any way simply lower the numbers of drops taken at a time and increase clean water intake. For some they will want to drop the dosage to 1 drop once or twice a day, to avoid any possible discomfort.
Both ingredients in Masterpeace are known and studied 100% safe and non toxic.
Please refer to our FAQ on our website and the brochure in our packages for similar instruction."
also Liquid “zeolites” are not really zeolites and do not offer any benefit to the human body. Any manipulation of this solid (such as making it liquid), destroys the beneficial cage-like structure and negative charge, rendering what's left (a pool of elements) useless and possibly even dangerous.
There is no evidence that methods used to bring natural clinoptilolite zeolite down to the nano range creates any free aluminum or destroys the fundamental structure providing the cage, charge, and even pH in solution. If you have evidence for this feel free to pass along here or to us at help@masterpeacebyhcs.com to further the evidence based discussion about this.
nano colloidal bio-chemistry is the core chemistry of our body fluids and nature makes nano scale and smaller medicines routinely including the sea plasma we use, shilajit, fluvic/humic minerals.. list goes on. In fact since clinoptilolite zeolite is often formed when a volcano explodes into the ocean, long term erosion is in play naturally with clinoptilolite zeolite in contact with ocean water. The oceans around the greek islands made entirely of it are known for their utter purity, even though tiny molecules of clinoptilolite are slowly eroded into those waters since time long long forgotten.
We have posted a full rebuttal to the above substack article here. but if you'd like a more readable pdf of it please reach out to the above mentioned email
This is outrageous. You obviously don’t know much about anything. First you are not using the correct kind of microscope, the kind that costs 100’s of thousands of dollars to buy. And the structures you see are obviously salt. You must not have done your studies correctly. I have used this product on myself and my 7 cats of which 1 of my cats started walking straight after 4 years of walking with a tilted head after a brain surgery. It stopped my other cats ear infection without any other help & it got a 3 cat to stop having a runny eye and runny nose. As for me personally I’m doing a hair test to see to what extent my toxic metals have gone down. I can feel the brain fog going away using this product. I’ve been using it since about July. The new double blind placebo studies are great proof it works. What is suspicious is all these people with microscopes for a few thousand dollars think they can see what they are looking at.
This takes many years of studying with special microscopes to be able to tell what you are looking for and with that European laboratory doing the 3 party study it is beyond proof that graphene oxide gets reduced within 90 days.
it's simple professional microscopy isn't it nicolina. out the window these days. Where's the spectroscopy machine required to know chemical composition in a microscope setting... professionally recognized requirements... thank you for telling the truth
I didn't do microscopy of urine or urine with the product as I don't want anybody to take this product to do an experiment. The urine analysis is a laboratory analysis, not microscopy. The microscopy is the product by itself on the slide.
to fully compare, place this opinion piece (this slander article here) which uses the wrong equipment.... written by someone pushing sunthetic chemicals that claim to do the same thing (EDTA) but are really just too toxic to get past animal safety trials and needed FDA emergency authorization for this author to be so bold with a synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner that they threw some salt on to make it a slower kill....
ahem... place this opinion piece next to this peer reviewed top journal published third party clinical trial published by not one but two of the greatest healers of our time dr robert o young and naturopath caroline mansfield
by the way dr robert young, who's work this opinion piece in-part slanders, is an expert on that substance now for decades. He knows sodium chlorite is the easier and better option to get chlorine dioxide into a human. check out his prime pH product. that's what it is. sodium chlorite. related compound to the n'th degree~
Yes I know his work and he did my live blood analysis, but I have been using chlorine dioxide for 7 years and I follow Dr Andreas Kalcker protocols. Using sodium chlorite can work also assuming you have enough stomach acid.
I have a great deal of respect for both Dr Young and Dr Baxis, but I don’t agree with both of them all the time. Chlorine Dioxide is a water soluble gas made from adding an acid to sodium chlorite.
If Dr. Young really wrote that, he has no idea about the subject. Has Dr. Young documented and published similar treatment successes like Andreas Kalker?
oh why shorten your beautiful comment? here it is in full:
"sodium chloride is a starting product for the production of cdl. If Dr. Young really wrote that, he has no idea about the subject. You obviously don't either. What you write is total nonsense. I recommend that you consult Dr. Kalker. He cures diabetic legs, necrotic tissue, cancer, etc. He knows exactly what CDL is and how it works in the body. Has Dr. Young documented and published similar treatment successes?"
glad you're so passionate about it im sure you'll read the following then:
Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt has warned that in his experience these liquid zeolites liberate the aluminum that is naturally occurring in zeolite and set a person’s brain on fire with aluminum after a couple years. He also said that while the person is being poisoned by liquid zeolite they may initially feel good or better and this will trick them into thinking it’s a great product. He said the same thing happened when Chinese emperors used mercury for healing in China. It looked like it was working great at first. So you are saying there are tons of toxic metals in it and also that there are other issues that you identify through dark field microscopy? I am so glad you are doing this study.
provably not true, completely not true. the claim was that this is in his book and it's not. not a chapter not a mention of zeolite in the book "dr" ana is saying has dr k here talking about zeolite. naturopath caroline mansfield broke that on CRROW777 so i guess it's time to get hip
EDIT: SORRY. Thought you were talking about this book that dr ana was claiming my bad my bad. called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger.
well dr klingheart is true about synthetic zeolites. there's proof it poisons animals in the medical literature. TRS is a synthetic zeolite marketed to humans and that should be 100% stopped
SORRY. Thought you were talking about this book that dr ana was claiming my bad my bad. called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger.
well dr klingheart is true about synthetic zeolites. there's proof it poisons animals in the medical literature. TRS is a synthetic zeolite marketed to humans and that should be 100% stopped
Totally fine. I understand. Dr k is very worried about the damage these zeolite sprays are doing. He tried it 15 years ago when they first came out and he was alarmed by the high aluminum in the brain after using it. It’s not much harder to just buy the powdered zeolite and add water to or use Chlorella instead (which is the safe way to detox).
please check if he's talking about synthetic zeolite. the evidence that it's poisoning people needs to get out. There is 0 toxicity in over 300 medical papers on the medical application of *natural clinoptilolite zeolite* if one says *zeolite* and leaves it at that. they are not sufficiently infomed on the differences within the category. Synthetic "zeolite" is an abomination made by man. natural clinoptilolite zeolite is the real deal with a 100% safety record in peer reviewed literature. not so for that synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner with some salt thrown on it thats going around as a chelator these days... edta...
The problem is when they make it liquid. It removes the structure that absorbs the aluminum that is in zeolite. People should just use zeolite in its natural form and not in any of these sprays.
I am not too familiar with these products but follow Dr. klinghardts protocol for detoxing- for me and my kids- and use the powder from Ki Science that he recommends. Is this different than what you’re referencing? Is the liquid version the only dangerous version?
As long as you follow what Dr K recommends you are doing it safely. Powdered zeolite or capsules from kiscience or biopureus are good.The liquid zeolites are multi level marketing products that are being pushed heavily on social media. They say just squirt it in your mouth and you will detox. Unfortunately most people don’t know about Dr. Klinghardt’s concerns about these liquids being full of aluminum.
talk to him about it. he wont find that with natural clinoptilolite zeolite nano colloidal products. if he thinks nano colloidal chemistry in biology and the power of nano colloids is bunk... well thats easy to disprove. so i doubt he says that either
I’ve watched enough his lectures to know to avoid all liquid zeolites. He may that very clear. And that’s good enough for me. I use Chlorella mostly and powdered sometimes.
What you say about Dr. Klinghardt's MD, PhD experience and input on liquid zeolite is true. I recall hearing him say exactly this in a presentation a few months ago. People may get good results in the beginning, however, after a while or few years, they will start having problems because of the accumulation of aluminum (and other heavy metals?) in the brain. He was hesitant to say this, not wanting to offend others, however, he was concerned about this problem and issue.
About the claim here that the human consciousness support company clearly doesn't have the particle range as advertised... because the solution has visible particles to the naked eye.. why not ask the company as this is what they say about the particle range and have said for a year plus quite publicly:
Particle Size:
90% 1-300NM
Full Spectrum of
Key Nano Range
Why not check on the particle range for that other 10% before making claims about unclaimed claims?
Would top tier published clinical trials on this product be able to get away with the same left field conjecture? No.
Additionally the basics of nano colloidal chemistry include knowledge of agglomeration of highly or oversaturated nano colloidal solutions.... completely ignored here in research about... a nano colloidal product that is saturated to the gills with the active natural ingredients. Quote from the company about the stringy clumps:
"This is a product of MasterPeace being a natural product made of a highly saturated nano colloidal solution. Nano colloidal solutions can easily clump up into artifacts like this if the maker doesn't skimp on the concentration. We can assure you that it's just natural clinoptilolite zeolite and sea plasma. Those are the only ingredients in our formula. In the same vein, some bottles are cloudier than others. The majority of the potency of the formula nonetheless is in the dissolved and unseen realm in this solution."
It's just so clear the author had no interest in researching the company or contacting them to research.
hey i see you followed me. can we message on here? if so message me if its possible to send you the documents to prove this via this platform. im not sure. i got on this OPINION website because a natural miracle is being slandered by synthetic poison pushers so im not familiar with the platform.
so we're still looking at salt and calling it nano tech? dang. |
didn't even bother to contact the company to check what they say about the particle range in the product lol "Nano Sized??????" how about add a few more question marks next time lol. good luck seeing nano range with a dark field microscope or whatever this is for this opinion piece.
10% of the formula is in a larger range.. on purpose... also if you've studied nano colloidal chemistry at all you would know about nano agglomeration and would have at least mentioned it as a possibility with some of your "findings" but no... what are your nano colloidal training again? Lets compare it to dr robert o young when you get a chance.
oh you do push synthetic chemicals that claim to do the same thing (EDTA) but are really just too toxic to get past animal safety trials and needed FDA emergency authorization for you to be so bold with a synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner that they threw some salt on to make it a slower kill
note the concentration of the natural ingredients in masterpeace is so much more. 100mcg or less a day in dose (probably less) compared to 1200mcg per day in dose comparing pbx to MP
What is important is the technical feasibility of what they are trying to achieve.
Zeolites are porous networks of aluminum oxides and other metals - including heavy metals.
Is it possible to nanosize these oxides without releasing Al, Pb, Hg, etc.... into the solution?
If you do, how do you remove them? by magic?
When used as catalysts, you don't nanosize them because you need a specific surface area big enough to catalyze your reactions. Have the merchants demonstrated that nanosized particles still have enough specific surface area?
this substack blocks dissent. i am now on a 2nd account to post more plain english discourse over this slander
"I first heard about this product from a friend abroad. When I first looked into it superficially my thoughts were, well it all sounds good, but where is the evidence? Testimonials are not enough for me to come to a conclusion if a product works as the placebo effect is very powerful."
Didn't bother to notice the top tier peer reviewed published article on MasterPeace removing graphene oxide via the high level IEC test at a top independent german lab i guess. well here it is:
Or maybe the 300+ medical papers on the main ingredient of natural clinoptilolite zeolite. You may notice if you do, the 100% safety record in the medical literature for that natural ingredient. Across the board.
hah not even denying that you blocked me and i got the picture proof. you block plain english truth about your slander opinion pieces. good luck with that MO
sarcasm alert: you clearly do your research. you're putting mike yeadon's name right next to an article praising synthetic ivermectin on your substack. you know he's called it “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across”.”
you are a synthetic poison pusher and a natural medicine slanderer
are you aware of this publication prior to misspelling the product name in a slander piece using the wrong microscopes to make heavily implied slander claims
why switch this comment from part 2 to part 3? gotta take more time to actually look at the study? here it is top journal reviewed and 3rd party clinical trialed: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
Obviously you are not the one doing any of this research, just disparaging this author with vehement persistence, hell bent on pushing your poisonous points. Tossing around your preferred research articles and other MD name dropping certainly is your MO in gaslighting, exposing your avarice and contempt. I say, Take a hike and keep your self indulgent and toxic proselytizing to yourself!
That goes for either your knucklehead buddy, or your alternate troll moniker Citta7!
it's pictures of salt under a microscope. mike adams used to sell cesium eliminator zeolite. he believed in that so much he made that product himself!
then he got a completely different understanding of it suddenly.... strange since hundreds of medical papers on natural clinoptilolite zeolite are already performed with over 300 studies and a 100% safety record in the medical literature. There is zero evidence or truth to the notion that natural clinoptilolite zeolite imparts aluminum toxicity. the alumino silicate structure is the structure that gives it the powerful natural binding negative charge. And in no way is there free aluminum or aluminum toxicity imparted by a clean natural clinoptilolite zeolite product.
Thanks for this link. I've just listened to Mike's illuminating and impressive podcast - Zeolite warning over high lead and aluminum levels. A very worthwhile listen. It clarifies a lot!
Interestingly, he cautioned about the dangers of health industry hype and spurious claims made by many unethical operators. The conversation was from 6 years ago but is now extremely apt and timely.
Wow. Some seriously rude paid detractors, trolls and fake accounts in this Comment section causing havoc. Maybe they are bots who can't spell or use correct grammar, besides being immature and unprofessional. It's really a waste of energy. How many of us microscopists and researchers need to show evidence that this product is not pure? I think we are up to 3 now. Anyone can look for themselves with a simple optical microscope. No one yet has accused the HSC Company of knowing that their product is deliberately adulterated. I could easily understand that taking ocean water and dumping into a bottle will have heavy metals and Nanotech in it. I have found Nano structures in ocean water from a diver who collected it 8 feet underwater, 30 miles out in the Atlantic Ocean. If the HSC Company is indeed innocent, then they have not done their due diligence of testing their own product. I do not believe in Censorship, but you meanies who love to piss off professional writers and researchers on Substack should be permanently blocked. Please Stop attacking Dr. Baxas and those of us who are exposing the Nanotech. We are trying to save Humanity and all of life here! Dr. Baxas has done the most extensive analysis so far and she should be rewarded. We are in an Information War as well as a War of Good against Evil, and you trolls are clearly on the evil side; you will not be rewarded by the MasterPeace company, Dr. Young, the Controllers and their minions, or the satanic transhumanists; they are using you to do their bidding. Go Away! – Excellent Work, Dr. Baxas! Keep it up!
As someone who has previously owned a commercial zeolite business I am obviously a fan of the proper uses of the right type of zeolites in the proper applications. The bots have made errors above such as it being made only in the oceans at high temperatures ( actually considered low in these processes at about 200') . Its also made naturally in the ground and in volcanic lakes inland.
Also the total disparaging of the man made ones is stupid when considering that some of the man made ones are made without the aluminum content that is such an issue for the body and brain. As one of the 4 qdots is made of cesium (yellow one?) according to the literature and zeolite is one of the few substances capable of capturing it and allowing excretion that may be one application worthy of study in the future I wont bother engaging with the bots here as true logic doesn't apply for them surprisingly.
The most important element here is not mentioned by the bots, and that's the possible use of the zeolite by the tech to assemble, if that's the case. My take on that is that if it assembled with the zeolite it would capture them for excretion, at a best possibility. Their answer here is to deny the tech, yet the promoters of the product don't do this and in fact say the opposite. Which ones are not being entirely honest I wonder? Can't have it both ways.
Regarding the point of what we see with a dark field microscope - that will always be under attack with a mix of truth and BS as above. As I have seen particles of zeolite jumping up and down continuously in a bucket without any outside influence I would expect to see some radical movement under a slide as well that defies normal experience ( just a note) and similar given its cationic ( cat I on ic ) exchange capacity .
The one main point the bots have right is that there is probably a combined 500k different forms of zeolite possible via activation and doping. Its very likely that one of those will be of benefit to us, but that's likely to be missed by the vast majority in any debate over a specific product.
There is a claim of censorship here which I too despise but I see no evidence of that. I would rather put up with a few dickheads and vested interested parties attacking than see censorship to be honest. Most thinking people can easily see past that sort of behavior and it only shows desperation on their part, and is ultimately self defeating.
Bot! Hah! The promoters dont "deny the tech" but the "bots" do? what planet are you on. You mean how dr young uses the phrase correctly: "Nano technology" to reference getting a natural zeolite down to the nano size? Sheesh what a reach. Check with the company, i work there lol.
about the blocking claim you think is from a bot how about message me as i have the screenshots email chit7@tuta.io because im not a bot like you claim. my first account here was blocked from commenting and i have picture proof.
"The bots have made errors above such as it being made only in the oceans at high temperatures ( actually considered low in these processes at about 200') . Its also made naturally in the ground and in volcanic lakes inland."
i was responding to the claim that zeolite in water isnt natural. how did you get the above scrape of a claim out of that?
you say you're a zeolite business person but you make no difference between synthetic and natural and between the different types of zeolite. like there isnt only one type of natural zeolite that's at all considered for human consumption for binding poison.... natural clinoptilolite zeolite.
also there is a 100% safety record in over 300 medical papers on natural clinoptilolite on pub med. meanwhile there's proof in the literature on there that man made zeolite causes poisoning. much less the mountain of terrible testimonials gathered on synthetic zeolite sprays which i can link. just one example here of a popular synthetic "Zeolite A" causing poisoning down to the bone in cows: https://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-7075-10-2
You make it sound like the bond formed as a volcano explodes into the ocean creating clinoptilolite zeolite... is the damn same as some chemicals in an autoclave. man's hubris!
OK, Its now established that you work for the company. Fair enough but that does make you a vested interested party here and your attacks are likely to be seen as biased by any thinking person.
If you want to debate zeolites as being useful for what we are dealing with today, in a polite and reasonable manner I am happy to do so under some civilized debating terms. This includes responding to each point made, without answering like a politician.
"you say you're a zeolite business person"
As clearly stated I am someone who has previously owned a commercial zeolite business and a fan of the proper uses of the right type of zeolites in the proper applications. I have no current zeolite business today and am unbiased with no vested interest either way.
"also there is a 100% safety record"
I suggest you moderate your 100% safe claim considering that the papers do not take into account that we are dealing with something new that was not taken into account when the studies were done.
Question - Do you agree that we are dealing with advanced nano technology in human bodies today as one of the major issues?.
lol vested interest she slanders my godchild and i show up what a surprise.
i dont say im a zeolite business person. are you thinking of matthew hazen? im matthew sena. was i responding to the notion of a business zeolite person or something and you're taking a quote out of context? Either way i know if dont "call" myself that. I'm infinite consciousness in a body called matt sena. and a godparent of masterpaece. Are you making more assumptions again like im a bot and baxas didnt block my first account... good track record on those assumptions so far...
how about you get some proof for that thing you were so worried about and follow up like i asked if anyone wants the proof she blocked my comments on this slander opinion piece against my godchild. email chit7@tuta.io to see the screenshot of that block on my other "citta" account on here. just ask for it from my email or on messenger here if i can send pictures on here i dont know i just get on here to tell the truth against these poison pushing slanderers and listen to john rappaport.
back to your thinly veiled untruth in your series of questions or whatever it is:
and something new? we use two ingredients that have been on the earth since time forever. there is 100% safety record in the medical literature for natural clinoptilolite zeolite.
advanced nano tech is getting poisons, especially man made synthetic ones (mmmm sounds like edta), down to the small scale and making them bioavailable. thats the truth of it from what i see. we have natural medicine here that is up to the task of removing nano pollution and this is top journal peer review 3rd party clinical tested.
check out the long rebuttal we just posted here. too
I ask one simple question and you cannot reply with a simple yes or no answer as a starting point.. That is the very definition of a politicians answer.
You don't appear to understand " ... " means a quote.
"I'm infinite consciousness in a body called matt sena. and a godparent of masterpaece" - You abuse others for spelling when it was clearly meant to be spelt that way but "masterpaece" is Ok by you representing the company.? Thanks for the chuckle.
You came into this comment section using deception instead of identifying yourself at the beginning so that everyone could understand your position was one of a vested interest party. This very much establishes your honesty and credibility here.
I did look at the "we" rebuttal and can tell its written by someone else as it is at least structured.
All your writing and attacks are very bot like and I still wonder if you are human. If you are and worked for me you wouldn't have a job any more as you botched this up royally.
An example would be " not one complaint' to your department and even here that one person tells us that he never got a response even though that's your job. Perhaps focus on what your job actually is and leave the defense / attacks to someone more capable.
I have no further time for you. Please don't dig your hole any deeper.
if one of your implyed and vague points is that all nano is toxic. you're wrong as your own body fluids are naturally a nano colloid. so if that was true you'd be full of poison... naturally.. also shijalit, sea plasma, marine plasma... these naturally PICOMETER mineral supplements. are even smaller than nano.
lol a slander opinion article that gets it all wrong is immature. right.... in decent science you dont start your reserach presentation with a slander claim. also this isnt a research paper, it's an uncited opinion piece that could never get published like dr young gets published.
professor doctor lady, can you project any more obviously? you say natural this and that medicine on your description and then push synthetic man made abominations like IVM and EDTA which are hurting untold many people currently and then slander with unprofessional zero evidence or proper explanation tripe.... the natural medicines. You're a dr and professor at a school i can't look up online? And you clearly have no grasp on psychological projection
Thanks for your analysis so far Anita. I know the company that sells this particular product. I took it for a month and it fucked me up. I really regret having took it.
Not naming names but a Doctor who promotes this product, just suggested that it was my immune system that was making me feel so fatigued.
I find the whole episode very depressing because I was seeking treatment that wouldn’t harm me.
I look forward to part 2.
Not one person has told human consciousness support company that the following quoted suggestion didn't work to fix any uncomfortableness. This after they approach the company and ask about uncomfortableness. not. one.
"There's no need to feel uncomfortable while taking MasterPeace. It's rare, but if one does feel uncomfortable in any way simply lower the numbers of drops taken at a time and increase clean water intake. For some they will want to drop the dosage to 1 drop once or twice a day, to avoid any possible discomfort.
Both ingredients in Masterpeace are known and studied 100% safe and non toxic.
Please refer to our FAQ on our website and the brochure in our packages for similar instruction."
spam
spam
Can you tell who is the producer (or the company that sells this particular product)? I would appreciate if you could give me the information.
MasterPeace - Human Consciousness
Thank you very much.
I have been using Vanterre Zeolite Clinoptilolite for some time and was alerted to this issue already by an article by Dr. Ana Mihalcea some time ago.
After reading this article, I will probably not use any of these modern, supposedly health-promoting products anymore, as they all seem to have undesirable and sometimes serious drawbacks like methylene blue or CDS.
So I will probably just stick to organic apple cider vinegar and the vitamins directly from certain fruits like lemons, etc.
book called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger. ana claims it slanders zeolite. well after buying the book... there's not mention of zeolite in it. she just lies lies lies
Yours might be a redacted edition...
interesting reach. well we got a picture of it on this video check it out. timestamp 35 minutes: https://rumble.com/v5jxpt9-crrow777-guest-caroline-mansfield-discusses-unfounded-claims.html
nobody is holding ana mihalcea accountable. also she's all like "ive already had two patients die of shedding"... well then how good of a doc are ya ana? maybe try the natural stuff not made of formaldehyde sodium cyanide acid and salt originally used a boiler room cleaner in industrial factories... maybe try that and learn the differences in the massive category of "zeolite" where there's only one kind fit for human consumption lol
"serious drawbacks like methylene blue"
Link please.
I have not heard of any serious drawbacks from methylene blue. So, any evidence and info would be appreciated.
Watch the videos of Tim Truth:
Don't Drink Your Pee- People Promoting This Disgusting Practice Need To Be Called Out - https://rumble.com/v4uds9n-dont-drink-your-pee-people-promoting-this-disgusting-practice-need-to-be-ca.html
GENOCIDE: Influencers Now Pushing Methylene Blue POISON! Mutagenic & Deadly?! IVM Binary Weapon? - https://rumble.com/v2uu971-genocide-influencers-now-pushing-methylene-blue-poison-mutagenic-and-deadly.html
There may be other videos of him.
Please provide the evidence regarding the serious drawbacks of methylene blue and CDS.
Thank you.
Are you able to direct me to information regarding drawbacks of both MB and.CDS. Am wondering if either/both are good for some/not so good for others -- simply must be determined individually?
I don't think so. Watch the videos of Tim Truth I mentioned.
Hi Anita,
Thanks for the well documented process you are doing here. I recently had the benefit of hearing how many have suffered serious problems after taking this product. A smaller % seemed to have no problem and that could indicate a low contamination of the tech in these people.
I look forward to parts 2 and 3.
Warm Regards,
Matt.
not one person has told human consciousness support company that the following quoted suggestion didn't work to fix any uncomfortableness. This after they approach the company and ask about uncomfortableness. not. one. person.
"There's no need to feel uncomfortable while taking MasterPeace. It's rare, but if one does feel uncomfortable in any way simply lower the numbers of drops taken at a time and increase clean water intake. For some they will want to drop the dosage to 1 drop once or twice a day, to avoid any possible discomfort.
Both ingredients in Masterpeace are known and studied 100% safe and non toxic.
Please refer to our FAQ on our website and the brochure in our packages for similar instruction."
masterpiece ist full with nano stuff https://unhackableanimal.substack.com/p/masterpeace-take-some-nanos-to-detox?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
also Liquid “zeolites” are not really zeolites and do not offer any benefit to the human body. Any manipulation of this solid (such as making it liquid), destroys the beneficial cage-like structure and negative charge, rendering what's left (a pool of elements) useless and possibly even dangerous.
Good Day,
Dr. Love came out with an article on all the defamation of MasterPeace which started a while back. https://drloveariyana.substack.com/p/clarifying-defamation-against-master
As well Caroline Mansfield was recently on Crrow777 to discuss and debunk the lies being spread https://rumble.com/v5jxpt9-crrow777-guest-caroline-mansfield-discusses-unfounded-claims.html
There is no evidence that methods used to bring natural clinoptilolite zeolite down to the nano range creates any free aluminum or destroys the fundamental structure providing the cage, charge, and even pH in solution. If you have evidence for this feel free to pass along here or to us at help@masterpeacebyhcs.com to further the evidence based discussion about this.
nano colloidal bio-chemistry is the core chemistry of our body fluids and nature makes nano scale and smaller medicines routinely including the sea plasma we use, shilajit, fluvic/humic minerals.. list goes on. In fact since clinoptilolite zeolite is often formed when a volcano explodes into the ocean, long term erosion is in play naturally with clinoptilolite zeolite in contact with ocean water. The oceans around the greek islands made entirely of it are known for their utter purity, even though tiny molecules of clinoptilolite are slowly eroded into those waters since time long long forgotten.
We have posted a full rebuttal to the above substack article here. but if you'd like a more readable pdf of it please reach out to the above mentioned email
Thank you so much for adressing that issue, Anita - blessings to you❣️🙏
This is outrageous. You obviously don’t know much about anything. First you are not using the correct kind of microscope, the kind that costs 100’s of thousands of dollars to buy. And the structures you see are obviously salt. You must not have done your studies correctly. I have used this product on myself and my 7 cats of which 1 of my cats started walking straight after 4 years of walking with a tilted head after a brain surgery. It stopped my other cats ear infection without any other help & it got a 3 cat to stop having a runny eye and runny nose. As for me personally I’m doing a hair test to see to what extent my toxic metals have gone down. I can feel the brain fog going away using this product. I’ve been using it since about July. The new double blind placebo studies are great proof it works. What is suspicious is all these people with microscopes for a few thousand dollars think they can see what they are looking at.
This takes many years of studying with special microscopes to be able to tell what you are looking for and with that European laboratory doing the 3 party study it is beyond proof that graphene oxide gets reduced within 90 days.
it's simple professional microscopy isn't it nicolina. out the window these days. Where's the spectroscopy machine required to know chemical composition in a microscope setting... professionally recognized requirements... thank you for telling the truth
we're still in the ages of calling salt nano tech. but that will end keep the faith!~
"The new double blind placebo studies are great proof it works. "
Link please, Nicolina.
Thanks for that. Its scary stuff
why? https://actascientific.com/ASMS/ASMS-08-1913.php
To fully compare, you should do the same microscopy of the urine without MP.
I didn't do microscopy of urine or urine with the product as I don't want anybody to take this product to do an experiment. The urine analysis is a laboratory analysis, not microscopy. The microscopy is the product by itself on the slide.
Understood. Thanks.
to fully compare, place this opinion piece (this slander article here) which uses the wrong equipment.... written by someone pushing sunthetic chemicals that claim to do the same thing (EDTA) but are really just too toxic to get past animal safety trials and needed FDA emergency authorization for this author to be so bold with a synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner that they threw some salt on to make it a slower kill....
ahem... place this opinion piece next to this peer reviewed top journal published third party clinical trial published by not one but two of the greatest healers of our time dr robert o young and naturopath caroline mansfield
https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
It’s a minefield out there. I will stick to chlorine dioxide.
at the very least, stay natural.
by the way dr robert young, who's work this opinion piece in-part slanders, is an expert on that substance now for decades. He knows sodium chlorite is the easier and better option to get chlorine dioxide into a human. check out his prime pH product. that's what it is. sodium chlorite. related compound to the n'th degree~
Yes I know his work and he did my live blood analysis, but I have been using chlorine dioxide for 7 years and I follow Dr Andreas Kalcker protocols. Using sodium chlorite can work also assuming you have enough stomach acid.
you know his work, which i trust, but you talk of stomach acid being useful. perhaps in this case yes.. but i truly truly doubt it. given: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-stomach-bicarbonate-factory
I have a great deal of respect for both Dr Young and Dr Baxis, but I don’t agree with both of them all the time. Chlorine Dioxide is a water soluble gas made from adding an acid to sodium chlorite.
If Dr. Young really wrote that, he has no idea about the subject. Has Dr. Young documented and published similar treatment successes like Andreas Kalker?
oh why shorten your beautiful comment? here it is in full:
"sodium chloride is a starting product for the production of cdl. If Dr. Young really wrote that, he has no idea about the subject. You obviously don't either. What you write is total nonsense. I recommend that you consult Dr. Kalker. He cures diabetic legs, necrotic tissue, cancer, etc. He knows exactly what CDL is and how it works in the body. Has Dr. Young documented and published similar treatment successes?"
glad you're so passionate about it im sure you'll read the following then:
check it out: https://phmiracleproducts.com/products/chlorine-dioxide-clo2-booklet?_pos=1&_sid=b5a07fc7b&_ss=r
Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt has warned that in his experience these liquid zeolites liberate the aluminum that is naturally occurring in zeolite and set a person’s brain on fire with aluminum after a couple years. He also said that while the person is being poisoned by liquid zeolite they may initially feel good or better and this will trick them into thinking it’s a great product. He said the same thing happened when Chinese emperors used mercury for healing in China. It looked like it was working great at first. So you are saying there are tons of toxic metals in it and also that there are other issues that you identify through dark field microscopy? I am so glad you are doing this study.
provably not true, completely not true. the claim was that this is in his book and it's not. not a chapter not a mention of zeolite in the book "dr" ana is saying has dr k here talking about zeolite. naturopath caroline mansfield broke that on CRROW777 so i guess it's time to get hip
EDIT: SORRY. Thought you were talking about this book that dr ana was claiming my bad my bad. called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger.
well dr klingheart is true about synthetic zeolites. there's proof it poisons animals in the medical literature. TRS is a synthetic zeolite marketed to humans and that should be 100% stopped
I heard him say it so it’s true.
SORRY. Thought you were talking about this book that dr ana was claiming my bad my bad. called Global Brain Chip Mesogens by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger.
well dr klingheart is true about synthetic zeolites. there's proof it poisons animals in the medical literature. TRS is a synthetic zeolite marketed to humans and that should be 100% stopped
Totally fine. I understand. Dr k is very worried about the damage these zeolite sprays are doing. He tried it 15 years ago when they first came out and he was alarmed by the high aluminum in the brain after using it. It’s not much harder to just buy the powdered zeolite and add water to or use Chlorella instead (which is the safe way to detox).
please check if he's talking about synthetic zeolite. the evidence that it's poisoning people needs to get out. There is 0 toxicity in over 300 medical papers on the medical application of *natural clinoptilolite zeolite* if one says *zeolite* and leaves it at that. they are not sufficiently infomed on the differences within the category. Synthetic "zeolite" is an abomination made by man. natural clinoptilolite zeolite is the real deal with a 100% safety record in peer reviewed literature. not so for that synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner with some salt thrown on it thats going around as a chelator these days... edta...
The problem is when they make it liquid. It removes the structure that absorbs the aluminum that is in zeolite. People should just use zeolite in its natural form and not in any of these sprays.
I am not too familiar with these products but follow Dr. klinghardts protocol for detoxing- for me and my kids- and use the powder from Ki Science that he recommends. Is this different than what you’re referencing? Is the liquid version the only dangerous version?
As long as you follow what Dr K recommends you are doing it safely. Powdered zeolite or capsules from kiscience or biopureus are good.The liquid zeolites are multi level marketing products that are being pushed heavily on social media. They say just squirt it in your mouth and you will detox. Unfortunately most people don’t know about Dr. Klinghardt’s concerns about these liquids being full of aluminum.
talk to him about it. he wont find that with natural clinoptilolite zeolite nano colloidal products. if he thinks nano colloidal chemistry in biology and the power of nano colloids is bunk... well thats easy to disprove. so i doubt he says that either
I’ve watched enough his lectures to know to avoid all liquid zeolites. He may that very clear. And that’s good enough for me. I use Chlorella mostly and powdered sometimes.
What you say about Dr. Klinghardt's MD, PhD experience and input on liquid zeolite is true. I recall hearing him say exactly this in a presentation a few months ago. People may get good results in the beginning, however, after a while or few years, they will start having problems because of the accumulation of aluminum (and other heavy metals?) in the brain. He was hesitant to say this, not wanting to offend others, however, he was concerned about this problem and issue.
About the claim here that the human consciousness support company clearly doesn't have the particle range as advertised... because the solution has visible particles to the naked eye.. why not ask the company as this is what they say about the particle range and have said for a year plus quite publicly:
Particle Size:
90% 1-300NM
Full Spectrum of
Key Nano Range
Why not check on the particle range for that other 10% before making claims about unclaimed claims?
Would top tier published clinical trials on this product be able to get away with the same left field conjecture? No.
oh here's that other thing now: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/ASMS-08-1913.php
Additionally the basics of nano colloidal chemistry include knowledge of agglomeration of highly or oversaturated nano colloidal solutions.... completely ignored here in research about... a nano colloidal product that is saturated to the gills with the active natural ingredients. Quote from the company about the stringy clumps:
"This is a product of MasterPeace being a natural product made of a highly saturated nano colloidal solution. Nano colloidal solutions can easily clump up into artifacts like this if the maker doesn't skimp on the concentration. We can assure you that it's just natural clinoptilolite zeolite and sea plasma. Those are the only ingredients in our formula. In the same vein, some bottles are cloudier than others. The majority of the potency of the formula nonetheless is in the dissolved and unseen realm in this solution."
It's just so clear the author had no interest in researching the company or contacting them to research.
Meanwhile people in the comment section spread lies about a dr klinghart book that supposedly talks negative about zeolite... and that's been handily debunked already super publicly: https://www.crrow777radio.com/597-5-claims-made-against-episode-582-are-rxebutted-and-shown-to-be-false-free/
I stopped taking Zeolite after reading an article by Mike Adams (health ranger)
He was right it seems.
I can't believe Methylene Blue is safe. Much more likely that it is a toxic poison.
What say you others?
strange. mike adams was making and advertising zeolite product called cesium eliminator. why doesn't he mention that anymore and the website scrubbed?
hey i see you followed me. can we message on here? if so message me if its possible to send you the documents to prove this via this platform. im not sure. i got on this OPINION website because a natural miracle is being slandered by synthetic poison pushers so im not familiar with the platform.
I've read that MB is hard on the microbiome and we all know what that entails.
so we're still looking at salt and calling it nano tech? dang. |
didn't even bother to contact the company to check what they say about the particle range in the product lol "Nano Sized??????" how about add a few more question marks next time lol. good luck seeing nano range with a dark field microscope or whatever this is for this opinion piece.
10% of the formula is in a larger range.. on purpose... also if you've studied nano colloidal chemistry at all you would know about nano agglomeration and would have at least mentioned it as a possibility with some of your "findings" but no... what are your nano colloidal training again? Lets compare it to dr robert o young when you get a chance.
here's the top journal peer reviewed published literature on the matter to compare: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
oh you do push synthetic chemicals that claim to do the same thing (EDTA) but are really just too toxic to get past animal safety trials and needed FDA emergency authorization for you to be so bold with a synthetic industrial boiler room cleaner that they threw some salt on to make it a slower kill
Pure Body Extra!
note the concentration of the natural ingredients in masterpeace is so much more. 100mcg or less a day in dose (probably less) compared to 1200mcg per day in dose comparing pbx to MP
Wondering if that brand is safe...so many ND's are promoting it.
Forget about the brand.
What is important is the technical feasibility of what they are trying to achieve.
Zeolites are porous networks of aluminum oxides and other metals - including heavy metals.
Is it possible to nanosize these oxides without releasing Al, Pb, Hg, etc.... into the solution?
If you do, how do you remove them? by magic?
When used as catalysts, you don't nanosize them because you need a specific surface area big enough to catalyze your reactions. Have the merchants demonstrated that nanosized particles still have enough specific surface area?
That's why I don't buy their marketing ploy.
this substack blocks dissent. i am now on a 2nd account to post more plain english discourse over this slander
"I first heard about this product from a friend abroad. When I first looked into it superficially my thoughts were, well it all sounds good, but where is the evidence? Testimonials are not enough for me to come to a conclusion if a product works as the placebo effect is very powerful."
Didn't bother to notice the top tier peer reviewed published article on MasterPeace removing graphene oxide via the high level IEC test at a top independent german lab i guess. well here it is:
https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
Or maybe the 300+ medical papers on the main ingredient of natural clinoptilolite zeolite. You may notice if you do, the 100% safety record in the medical literature for that natural ingredient. Across the board.
Just wait until part 3. I looked at this study back in late June on the website.
hah not even denying that you blocked me and i got the picture proof. you block plain english truth about your slander opinion pieces. good luck with that MO
dont take it up with me though. check with dr robert o young and his actually published and referenced science: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/masterpeace-a-science-backed-solution-for-holistic-detoxification-and-wellness
sarcasm alert: you clearly do your research. you're putting mike yeadon's name right next to an article praising synthetic ivermectin on your substack. you know he's called it “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across”.”
you are a synthetic poison pusher and a natural medicine slanderer
here's the top medical journal published data on the pilot study on our website: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
are you aware of this publication prior to misspelling the product name in a slander piece using the wrong microscopes to make heavily implied slander claims
why switch this comment from part 2 to part 3? gotta take more time to actually look at the study? here it is top journal reviewed and 3rd party clinical trialed: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-08-1913.pdf
Obviously you are not the one doing any of this research, just disparaging this author with vehement persistence, hell bent on pushing your poisonous points. Tossing around your preferred research articles and other MD name dropping certainly is your MO in gaslighting, exposing your avarice and contempt. I say, Take a hike and keep your self indulgent and toxic proselytizing to yourself!
That goes for either your knucklehead buddy, or your alternate troll moniker Citta7!
Because it was a typo.
More great (& terrifying) work here Dr. Anita, thank you very much!
If you're interested, Mike Adams (the health ranger) highlighted the dangers of zeolites (by their very nature!) a few years back
https://sarahpenrose.substack.com/p/high-lead-pb-and-high-aluminium-al
(hope it's ok to link here...)
Cheers,
Sarah
it's pictures of salt under a microscope. mike adams used to sell cesium eliminator zeolite. he believed in that so much he made that product himself!
then he got a completely different understanding of it suddenly.... strange since hundreds of medical papers on natural clinoptilolite zeolite are already performed with over 300 studies and a 100% safety record in the medical literature. There is zero evidence or truth to the notion that natural clinoptilolite zeolite imparts aluminum toxicity. the alumino silicate structure is the structure that gives it the powerful natural binding negative charge. And in no way is there free aluminum or aluminum toxicity imparted by a clean natural clinoptilolite zeolite product.
Thanks for this link. I've just listened to Mike's illuminating and impressive podcast - Zeolite warning over high lead and aluminum levels. A very worthwhile listen. It clarifies a lot!
Interestingly, he cautioned about the dangers of health industry hype and spurious claims made by many unethical operators. The conversation was from 6 years ago but is now extremely apt and timely.
Wow. Some seriously rude paid detractors, trolls and fake accounts in this Comment section causing havoc. Maybe they are bots who can't spell or use correct grammar, besides being immature and unprofessional. It's really a waste of energy. How many of us microscopists and researchers need to show evidence that this product is not pure? I think we are up to 3 now. Anyone can look for themselves with a simple optical microscope. No one yet has accused the HSC Company of knowing that their product is deliberately adulterated. I could easily understand that taking ocean water and dumping into a bottle will have heavy metals and Nanotech in it. I have found Nano structures in ocean water from a diver who collected it 8 feet underwater, 30 miles out in the Atlantic Ocean. If the HSC Company is indeed innocent, then they have not done their due diligence of testing their own product. I do not believe in Censorship, but you meanies who love to piss off professional writers and researchers on Substack should be permanently blocked. Please Stop attacking Dr. Baxas and those of us who are exposing the Nanotech. We are trying to save Humanity and all of life here! Dr. Baxas has done the most extensive analysis so far and she should be rewarded. We are in an Information War as well as a War of Good against Evil, and you trolls are clearly on the evil side; you will not be rewarded by the MasterPeace company, Dr. Young, the Controllers and their minions, or the satanic transhumanists; they are using you to do their bidding. Go Away! – Excellent Work, Dr. Baxas! Keep it up!
(https://anitabaxasmd.substack.com/p/masterpiece-of-deception-a-trilogy/comments?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=post_viewer)
Hi FFW,
As someone who has previously owned a commercial zeolite business I am obviously a fan of the proper uses of the right type of zeolites in the proper applications. The bots have made errors above such as it being made only in the oceans at high temperatures ( actually considered low in these processes at about 200') . Its also made naturally in the ground and in volcanic lakes inland.
Also the total disparaging of the man made ones is stupid when considering that some of the man made ones are made without the aluminum content that is such an issue for the body and brain. As one of the 4 qdots is made of cesium (yellow one?) according to the literature and zeolite is one of the few substances capable of capturing it and allowing excretion that may be one application worthy of study in the future I wont bother engaging with the bots here as true logic doesn't apply for them surprisingly.
The most important element here is not mentioned by the bots, and that's the possible use of the zeolite by the tech to assemble, if that's the case. My take on that is that if it assembled with the zeolite it would capture them for excretion, at a best possibility. Their answer here is to deny the tech, yet the promoters of the product don't do this and in fact say the opposite. Which ones are not being entirely honest I wonder? Can't have it both ways.
Regarding the point of what we see with a dark field microscope - that will always be under attack with a mix of truth and BS as above. As I have seen particles of zeolite jumping up and down continuously in a bucket without any outside influence I would expect to see some radical movement under a slide as well that defies normal experience ( just a note) and similar given its cationic ( cat I on ic ) exchange capacity .
The one main point the bots have right is that there is probably a combined 500k different forms of zeolite possible via activation and doping. Its very likely that one of those will be of benefit to us, but that's likely to be missed by the vast majority in any debate over a specific product.
There is a claim of censorship here which I too despise but I see no evidence of that. I would rather put up with a few dickheads and vested interested parties attacking than see censorship to be honest. Most thinking people can easily see past that sort of behavior and it only shows desperation on their part, and is ultimately self defeating.
Warm Regards, Matt.
Thanks, Matt!
Bot! Hah! The promoters dont "deny the tech" but the "bots" do? what planet are you on. You mean how dr young uses the phrase correctly: "Nano technology" to reference getting a natural zeolite down to the nano size? Sheesh what a reach. Check with the company, i work there lol.
about the blocking claim you think is from a bot how about message me as i have the screenshots email chit7@tuta.io because im not a bot like you claim. my first account here was blocked from commenting and i have picture proof.
"The bots have made errors above such as it being made only in the oceans at high temperatures ( actually considered low in these processes at about 200') . Its also made naturally in the ground and in volcanic lakes inland."
i was responding to the claim that zeolite in water isnt natural. how did you get the above scrape of a claim out of that?
you say you're a zeolite business person but you make no difference between synthetic and natural and between the different types of zeolite. like there isnt only one type of natural zeolite that's at all considered for human consumption for binding poison.... natural clinoptilolite zeolite.
also there is a 100% safety record in over 300 medical papers on natural clinoptilolite on pub med. meanwhile there's proof in the literature on there that man made zeolite causes poisoning. much less the mountain of terrible testimonials gathered on synthetic zeolite sprays which i can link. just one example here of a popular synthetic "Zeolite A" causing poisoning down to the bone in cows: https://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-7075-10-2
You make it sound like the bond formed as a volcano explodes into the ocean creating clinoptilolite zeolite... is the damn same as some chemicals in an autoclave. man's hubris!
Hi Matt,
OK, Its now established that you work for the company. Fair enough but that does make you a vested interested party here and your attacks are likely to be seen as biased by any thinking person.
If you want to debate zeolites as being useful for what we are dealing with today, in a polite and reasonable manner I am happy to do so under some civilized debating terms. This includes responding to each point made, without answering like a politician.
"you say you're a zeolite business person"
As clearly stated I am someone who has previously owned a commercial zeolite business and a fan of the proper uses of the right type of zeolites in the proper applications. I have no current zeolite business today and am unbiased with no vested interest either way.
"also there is a 100% safety record"
I suggest you moderate your 100% safe claim considering that the papers do not take into account that we are dealing with something new that was not taken into account when the studies were done.
Question - Do you agree that we are dealing with advanced nano technology in human bodies today as one of the major issues?.
Regards,
Matt.
lol vested interest she slanders my godchild and i show up what a surprise.
i dont say im a zeolite business person. are you thinking of matthew hazen? im matthew sena. was i responding to the notion of a business zeolite person or something and you're taking a quote out of context? Either way i know if dont "call" myself that. I'm infinite consciousness in a body called matt sena. and a godparent of masterpaece. Are you making more assumptions again like im a bot and baxas didnt block my first account... good track record on those assumptions so far...
how about you get some proof for that thing you were so worried about and follow up like i asked if anyone wants the proof she blocked my comments on this slander opinion piece against my godchild. email chit7@tuta.io to see the screenshot of that block on my other "citta" account on here. just ask for it from my email or on messenger here if i can send pictures on here i dont know i just get on here to tell the truth against these poison pushing slanderers and listen to john rappaport.
back to your thinly veiled untruth in your series of questions or whatever it is:
and something new? we use two ingredients that have been on the earth since time forever. there is 100% safety record in the medical literature for natural clinoptilolite zeolite.
advanced nano tech is getting poisons, especially man made synthetic ones (mmmm sounds like edta), down to the small scale and making them bioavailable. thats the truth of it from what i see. we have natural medicine here that is up to the task of removing nano pollution and this is top journal peer review 3rd party clinical tested.
check out the long rebuttal we just posted here. too
I ask one simple question and you cannot reply with a simple yes or no answer as a starting point.. That is the very definition of a politicians answer.
You don't appear to understand " ... " means a quote.
"I'm infinite consciousness in a body called matt sena. and a godparent of masterpaece" - You abuse others for spelling when it was clearly meant to be spelt that way but "masterpaece" is Ok by you representing the company.? Thanks for the chuckle.
You came into this comment section using deception instead of identifying yourself at the beginning so that everyone could understand your position was one of a vested interest party. This very much establishes your honesty and credibility here.
I did look at the "we" rebuttal and can tell its written by someone else as it is at least structured.
All your writing and attacks are very bot like and I still wonder if you are human. If you are and worked for me you wouldn't have a job any more as you botched this up royally.
An example would be " not one complaint' to your department and even here that one person tells us that he never got a response even though that's your job. Perhaps focus on what your job actually is and leave the defense / attacks to someone more capable.
I have no further time for you. Please don't dig your hole any deeper.
if one of your implyed and vague points is that all nano is toxic. you're wrong as your own body fluids are naturally a nano colloid. so if that was true you'd be full of poison... naturally.. also shijalit, sea plasma, marine plasma... these naturally PICOMETER mineral supplements. are even smaller than nano.
lol a slander opinion article that gets it all wrong is immature. right.... in decent science you dont start your reserach presentation with a slander claim. also this isnt a research paper, it's an uncited opinion piece that could never get published like dr young gets published.
and what immaturity are you referencing? What testing are we not doing our due diligence on exactly? https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/masterpeace-a-science-backed-solution-for-holistic-detoxification-and-wellness
Yall are just surprised that i came here to call out the slander with clear english against my all natural god-baby of a miracle medicine.
professor doctor lady, can you project any more obviously? you say natural this and that medicine on your description and then push synthetic man made abominations like IVM and EDTA which are hurting untold many people currently and then slander with unprofessional zero evidence or proper explanation tripe.... the natural medicines. You're a dr and professor at a school i can't look up online? And you clearly have no grasp on psychological projection
You are just digging yourself deeper into a hole that can’t be repaired.
hah! those on the synthetic boiler room cleaner who slander natural medicine side are gonna come out on top? ever watch a movie?
👊