Are you using A.I. Enhancement? Because that could skew the results. I did a podcast on the A.I. deception and how it is being pushed. You might think this is interesting.
The positive claim that there is hydrogel apart from holograms, has still yet to be proven. The positive claim that there are nanobots have still yet to be proven.
Additionally the 10’s of 1000’s of hours and 1000’s of clients over decades, you don’t think for 1 second up until his passing, Dr. Harvey Bigelsen could seen the difference? Really?
I don’t know until when he did this work. It’s possible he didn’t when these new structures began showing up? It’s fairly new since the covid jabs were introduced end of 2020.
the highest scientific value is not articles in scientific journals or studies, but patents. The patent for self-organising nanoparticles was filed by Moderna. Ido Bachelet also presented the freely programmable nanobots at a Ted Med lecture in 2014, before entering into a cooperation with Pfizer in 2015. If you are now talking about proof, you either don't want to admit it because it doesn't fit into your world view, or you haven't done your homework. Either way, anyone who is still in their right mind and follows Dr Mihalcea's publications doesn't have to wait until a study announced by white coats ‘proves’ what we have been seeing for three years now. Shake your hea
Are you using A.I. Enhancement? Because that could skew the results. I did a podcast on the A.I. deception and how it is being pushed. You might think this is interesting.
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/ai-deception-2025?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
No. I don’t use AI
Ok. I thought some people used it to enhance the images.
I wouldn’t even know how to do that 😂😂😂
Just checking…
“Symprotits don’t move with intent”…how long have you looked at blood, darkfield or otherwise to say that?
Because that’s absolutely untrue!
The positive claim that there is hydrogel apart from holograms, has still yet to be proven. The positive claim that there are nanobots have still yet to be proven.
Additionally the 10’s of 1000’s of hours and 1000’s of clients over decades, you don’t think for 1 second up until his passing, Dr. Harvey Bigelsen could seen the difference? Really?
I don’t know until when he did this work. It’s possible he didn’t when these new structures began showing up? It’s fairly new since the covid jabs were introduced end of 2020.
Up until he passed 2019.
How can you make that claim?
the highest scientific value is not articles in scientific journals or studies, but patents. The patent for self-organising nanoparticles was filed by Moderna. Ido Bachelet also presented the freely programmable nanobots at a Ted Med lecture in 2014, before entering into a cooperation with Pfizer in 2015. If you are now talking about proof, you either don't want to admit it because it doesn't fit into your world view, or you haven't done your homework. Either way, anyone who is still in their right mind and follows Dr Mihalcea's publications doesn't have to wait until a study announced by white coats ‘proves’ what we have been seeing for three years now. Shake your hea
It has been proven that the nanotechnology is in human blood 🩸
Morgellons disease has proven this for decades now!